Where does it go?
Only to FinStat, and only the documents you choose to send. No access to your machine, your firm’s folders, or anyone’s accounts.
A quality of earnings report asks whether reported earnings are real. Before anyone can answer that, someone has to reconcile a messy ledger by hand — and on a live deal that is weeks, on the critical path. FinStat is the accounting tool your AI needs to do that part. Every transaction, not a sample. It never connects to the seller’s accounting system, because a seller in diligence will not grant access to one.
1,000,000 free tokens · no credit card · unlimited workspaces, no per-deal fee
The EBITDA bridge cannot start until the ledger is trustworthy. Today that means an analyst rebuilding a year or three of history before anyone can test a single add-back. With FinStat, that reconstruction takes hours, not the first weeks of the engagement.
The accounting export, bank and card statements, tax returns, internal financials. PDF, image, CSV or the export zip. No live connection to their system, and none required.
Every statement proven against the bank’s own printed balances. Every transaction tied to its page. Statements for one account recognized as the same account across periods, even when the institution is spelled two different ways. Anomalies surfaced rather than smoothed over. Tax returns and internal financials your AI reads beside FinStat’s reconciled books.
Add-backs, non-recurring items, related-party costs, the revenue quality opinion. Every figure traces to a sealed document, so a number you defend to a lender has a page behind it. The judgment stays yours.
FinStat builds highly accurate books and converts existing ones. It analyzes the seller’s existing books directly from their export, and it builds new books from the statements when the existing ones cannot be trusted — so you can put the two side by side.
FinStat sits ready for your AI to hand it work. Your AI decides what to do itself and what to give FinStat — by design — so the analyst’s time and the AI’s tokens go to the judgment, not the reconstruction. How FinStat compares →
Real findings from one completed engagement, anonymized. None of this is an answer. It is a list of places to look, each with its evidence attached — the first-week checks a good analyst does by hand, done for you. What any of it means stays with you.
Over 40% of revenue, in an account named for a fee. Read at face value, the business appears to have almost no labor cost and a crushing administrative burden. The opposite of the truth.
Five apparent accounts in that engagement were duplicates. Separately, one last-four was shared by two unrelated institutions, so matching on last-four alone merges accounts that have nothing to do with each other.
Funded, on inspection, by receipts that are not refunds. Whatever it is, it is not a supply expense, and left alone it nets against cost and overstates earnings.
The two have opposite add-back treatment. An owner’s personal policy comes back; a staff retirement match does not. Read the label and you get the bridge wrong.
Every one of those is machine-findable. Every line of the bridge is still yours.
Source: SBA SOP 50 10 8.1, Appendix 15 · effective October 1, 2026
The mandated cash test is a continuity chain: each period’s closing balance has to be the next period’s opening balance, on the same account, from the bank’s own printed figures — across the trailing twelve months and the two most recent fiscal years, on every account the business actually used. This is how the engine runs it.
No login to the target’s bank and no connection to their accounting file. The statements are both the input and the evidence, which is why a seller in diligence has nothing to refuse.
Nothing tells the engine which statements belong together. It binds each period to an account from the printed facts — owner, institution, account number. That matters in the field: on a live engagement the ledger presented twenty-three institution-and-account pairs and only eighteen were real accounts. Getting that wrong by hand is how a cash test quietly reconciles to the wrong thing.
Every period reconciles against its own printed controls and its closing balance has to equal the next opening balance to the cent. Nothing the documents cannot settle is guessed at — it returns as a review item with the source page attached, for a person to decide.
The last period costs what the first one did. That is what makes the lookback the SBA now requires a routine run rather than a project.
Written so you can hand it over as it is.
Only to FinStat, and only the documents you choose to send. No access to your machine, your firm’s folders, or anyone’s accounts.
No. It never logs in to a bank, never connects to their accounting file, holds no funds and cannot move money.
No. It reconstructs the books from the documents and surfaces what looks wrong. The add-back schedule and the earnings opinion are the analyst’s work, and they should be.
Every figure traces to a sealed source document. Show the lender the page, not a summary. A sealed document cannot be edited afterwards without it being detectable.
The privacy policy and the subprocessor list are public, written to go in front of a lender or an engagement letter as they are.
Take the target whose books you least want to rebuild. Hand the export to the AI you already use, with FinStat connected. Ask what does not tie. How FinStat compares →